Home Opinion Dear Editor Revocation of clearances by no means shocking

Revocation of clearances by no means shocking


Copyright © 2021 Roswell Daily Record

Discontinuing (revoking) one’s security clearance. Shocking? Atrocious? Unthinkable? I think not. During my 28 years in the U.S. Army I had many occasions to be “granted” (yes, allowed or permitted) a security clearance at various levels. It started with Confidential, then upped to Secret and eventually to Top Secret. When I did a stint at the Lawrence Radiation Lab, under the aegis of the (then) Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), I held the AEC’s “Q” clearance.

In every instance, when assigned to a job requiring a clearance, I was briefed on the seriousness and responsibilities of the clearance and I signed statements to that effect — and — when I no longer had the need for the clearance, i.e., left the job, my clearance was discontinued. And again I was debriefed and signed statements verifying that I no longer had or was entitled to the clearance.

Frankly, I’m shocked — shocked to learn that these high muckety-mucks retain their clearances after leaving their jobs, no matter under what circumstances they left, favorable or unfavorable. It seems only sensible to withdraw a security clearance when one leaves the job requiring it. If the advice or consult of the departed one is so important to get a job done, then that person may be “granted” a temporary security clearance.

It should be de rigueur to discontinue a person’s security clearance when that person leaves the job — regardless of what level the job was. Discontinuing a clearance is no impediment to one’s First Amendment “right to speak” as long long as the “speech” does not contain classified information.

Robert F. Lynd

Support Local Journalism
Subscribe to the Roswell Daily Record today.